NGV Global

  • Market Developments
    • CNG Cylinders
    • Vehicles
    • Equipment
    • Infrastructure
    • Maritime
    • Business
    • Industry Notices
  • Events
    • Upcoming
    • Event News
  • Vehicles & Fuels
    • Alternative Fuels
    • Biomethane
    • Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)
    • Hydrogen
    • Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
    • Natural Gas Vehicles (NGV)
  • Policy
  • Safety
  • Standards
  • Technology
    • Motorsport
    • Refuelling
    • Gas Storage
    • Engines
  • Association News
  • Editorial & Comment
  • People
  • Advertisers
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed
  • Home
  • About
  • Members Portal
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Calendar
  • Advertise
  • |
  • Español
Loading

Utah Resolution Calls on EPA to Make CNG Refueling Easier

January 27, 2009

USA, Salt Lake City

Utah’s House Transportation Committee has passed a resolution calling on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to streamline the certification process for those who make and install CNG conversion kits, and urges the creation of more private-public partnerships to increase the number of refueling stations in the state.


This resolution:

  • strongly urges the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promptly revise and streamline the certification requirements applicable to small volume manufacturers;
  • urges the EPA to waive requirements for recertifying conversion kits under certain  circumstances;
  • urges the EPA to permit small vehicle manufacturers to include vehicles and engines in a single engine category;
  • urges the EPA to provide additional guidance to small volume manufacturers regarding the conversion of older vehicle models;
  • urges the EPA to institute a natural gas vehicle research, development, and
  • demonstration funding program; and
  • encourages the formation of public and private partnerships to increase the states’ refueling infrastructure.

The bill passed unanimously in the House Transportation Committee and now moves to the House floor for further debate.

Print Friendly Print Get a PDF version of this webpage PDF
Categories: Policy | Comments (0)